Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi 9T and Galaxy XCover Pro feature extremely similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.