Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 score. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with as much memory for apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, they have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.