Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a general score of 82.4 against 81. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's one, both have equal internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.