Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a overall score of 81 against 78.2. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy XCover Pro is a better cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, we must highlight that it's also older, heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little greater pixel count per inch in the display and a little bigger display. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 25 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.