Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a general score of 81 against 77.1. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro's body is a little bit heavier and thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.