Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is much better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has newer 12 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer construction is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better video definition and a lot larger camera sensor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.