Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a score of 81 against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is extremely older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.