Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 global score. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit lower pixel density, they both have a screen with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor providing a lot lower image quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 25 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.