Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's 80.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 count with similar screens, they have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a same size screen and a better pixels number in each display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with faster 120 frames per second video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.