Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's memory capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a way better video definition and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.