Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 81 score against 80.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features and performance improvements. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, Galaxy XCover Pro is an a lot thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit bigger display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way better (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.