Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 81 score against 76.6. Despite being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is noticeably heavier and notably thicker than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a screen that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite lower screen density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit longer battery life than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 1 percent more battery size.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way higher resolution camera, a way larger camera sensor and a way higher 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.