Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than ZTE Axon 20, getting an 81 score against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, way thicker and somewhat heavier phone than ZTE Axon 20.
ZTE Axon 20 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The ZTE Axon 20 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 20 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4220mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also cheaper than the ZTE Axon 20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.