Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's overall score of 78.1. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you identical OS features.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a display that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments, a lot better video resolution and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.