Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-02-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.31 x 2.31 x 0.49 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 175 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB (200 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Galaxy Young, having an 81.3 score against 54.8. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is newer and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy Young's, but it is a lot heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Young, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a lot larger screen and a way higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy Young, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Young, because it has 60 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Young, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Young, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than Galaxy Young, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.