Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than iPhone 11 Pro Max's overall score of 85.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, lighter and thinner than iPhone 11 Pro Max. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 operating system, while iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a quite higher display density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3969mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have a camera with a 12 MP resolution and a same size aperture.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is also cheap compared to the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.