Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro design is older, just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The iPhone 12 Pro and Galaxy Z Flip 3 have extremely similar storage capacity for apps and games, both have exactly the same internal storage.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 2 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with superior battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.