Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's overall score of 85.6. Despite being the best we compare here, the iPhone 12 Pro Max is an older, heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. IPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features as much memory to store more games and applications as the Galaxy Z Flip 3, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a little more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.