Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
IPhone 13 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images. IPhone 13 Pro's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip 3's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.