Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 9.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 6s, having a score of 85.6 against 83. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is incredibly newer and a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Apple iPhone 6s. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 works with Android 11 operating system, and Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system.
IPhone 6s counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The Apple iPhone 6s features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a just a little lower pixels density, a lot worse 1334 x 750 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen.
IPhone 6s features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a 12 MP back camera. Apple iPhone 6s features as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Apple iPhone 6s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Apple iPhone 6s. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Apple iPhone 6s, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.