Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 9.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, having an 85.6 score against 84.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is incredibly newer, a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Apple iPhone 6s Plus. Galaxy Z Flip 3 comes with Android 11 operating system, and Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with iOS 9.x operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 6s Plus shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a same resolution back facing camera. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus and Galaxy Z Flip 3 count with incredibly similar storage for games and applications, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features improved battery lifetime than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than iPhone 6s Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone 6s Plus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and get the iPhone 6s Plus, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.