Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the iPhone 7, having an 85.6 score against 81.6. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a lot heavier than iPhone 7, it's just a bit thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger display.
The Apple iPhone 7 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster CPU than iPhone 7, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The iPhone 7 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 68 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs more money than the iPhone 7, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.