Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a incredibly older, a little heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. IPhone 8 Plus has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 8 Plus features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit lower pixel density. The iPhone 8 Plus has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a F1.8 aperture and a 12 megapixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features better battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the iPhone 8 Plus is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.