Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's general score of 85.6. The iPhone X body is a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. IPhone X features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Apple iPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone X has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone X costs a bit more money than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.