Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a bit better than Apple iPhone XR's 82 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is much newer, thinner and a little lighter than Apple iPhone XR. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a greater display density, a little bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 2 less and slower processing cores and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 12% more battery capacity. The iPhone XR shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same diafragm aperture and a 12 MP camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs more money than Apple iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Apple iPhone XR. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save some dollars and get the Apple iPhone XR, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.