Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Apple iPhone XS, getting an 85.6 score against 84.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The Apple iPhone XS has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little more expensive than the Apple iPhone XS, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.