Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 85.6 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is a lot newer and thinner than Google Pixel 3's, although it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a screen that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 3's display, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Google Pixel 3 features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also has a back facing camera with more MP.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.