Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 85.6 score against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Google Pixel 4 features a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 3's processor, and although the Google Pixel 4 has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture and a more mega pixels back camera. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.