Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a score of 85.6 against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little lighter than Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 4 XL's processor is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 3's CPU, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with more mega pixels. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4 XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.