Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. The Google Pixel 5 is an older and thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Google was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 5 has as much storage capacity to install games and applications as Galaxy Z Flip 3, both have equal internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 5. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 5 shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4080mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.