Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is much better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer and noticeably thinner phone than the HTC One M9, although it's also heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The HTC One M9 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. HTC One M9 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The HTC One M9 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC One M9, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.