Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than HTC U Ultra, having a general score of 85.6 against 77. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a way newer and thinner phone than the HTC U Ultra, although it's just a bit heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a just a little better screen density.
The HTC U Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and a F1.8 aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs more than the HTC U Ultra, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.