Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 85.6 score against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is heavier than LG G7 Fit, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The LG G7 Fit features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.