Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, with an 85.6 score against 81. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is extremely newer and thinner than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better processing power than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better count of pixels per display inch.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.