Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V10's overall score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and extremely thinner than LG V10. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, giving some extra features.
The LG V10 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a greater processing power than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 7 more cores.
LG V10 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V10 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V10 also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V10, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.