Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
LG V30S ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 both count with extremely similar batteries.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.