Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 85.6 against 81.3. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is somewhat heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 and LG V35 ThinQ both feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.