Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with an 85.6 score against 81.2. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a little heavier than LG V40 ThinQ, it's just a little bit thinner and also way newer. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG V40 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 count with very similar batteries duration. The LG V40 ThinQ has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.