Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but LG Wing has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the LG Wing design is older, a lot heavier and noticeably thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The LG Wing has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better performance than LG Wing. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM. The LG Wing shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Wing also has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Wing counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG Wing and the Galaxy Z Flip 3 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.