Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, with an 89.6 score against 85.6. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, it must be noted that it's also older, way thicker and just a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola edge, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a bit better pixel density. Motorola edge counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Motorola edge takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola edge also has a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola edge has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola edge is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.