Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 global score. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 is older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit lower screen density, they both have a same size screen. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Galaxy Z Flip 3 have really similar memory for games and applications, both have the same internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.