Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is extremely older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's design is still thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.