Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a global score of 86.3 against 85.6. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, it's thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit less pixels per inch of display, they both have a display of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.