Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a global score of 87.1 against 85.6. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, it is just a bit heavier and way thicker. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little less pixels per inch of screen, they both have a screen of the same size. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.