Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Moto G 5G, with an 85.6 score against 81.5. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G 5G, even when they were released only 8 months apart. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a little bit greater pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Moto G 5G captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and a way better 48 MP resolution camera. The Moto G 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.