Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Moto G Power (2021), having a score of 85.6 against 76.5. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 and the Moto G Power (2021) were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is somewhat lighter and way thinner. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a better display than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a way greater pixels count per screen inch, a quite bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G Power (2021) features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Moto G Power (2021) features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power (2021) has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.