Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s global score of 79.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), although both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a bit greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity. The Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.