Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a way thicker and a little heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Galaxy Z Flip 3, both have the same internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Moto G200 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G200 5G has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.