Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than Moto G60, with an 85.6 score against 79.5. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Moto G60 were only released 4 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip 3 is somewhat lighter and a lot thinner. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636. Motorola Moto G60 has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
Moto G60 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Moto G60 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has an 82% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.