Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than the Moto G7 Plus, with a overall score of 85.6 against 76.1. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but a little bit heavier than Moto G7 Plus.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a quite bigger display, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a larger aperture. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.